Cases 1 - 10 of 1,167
JOHNSON v. COLVIN POST OFFICE et al
as 2:2024cv00324
Defendant:
COLVIN POST OFFICE and JANE DOE
Plaintiff:
ROBERT W JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Goneau et al v. Cannon et al
as 1:2024cv12332
Defendant:
Shaun Peterson, Scott Smith, Austin Alves and others
Plaintiff:
Tre T. Goneau and Melissa Goneau
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mlynick v. Town of Erving et al
as 3:2024cv30108
Plaintiff:
John Mlynick
Defendant:
Town of Erving, Tucker Jenkins, Adam Paicos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Roberts v. DCHD
as 1:2024cv12266
Defendant:
DCHD
Plaintiff:
Cherrelle Roberts
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
JOHNSON v. WATERVILLE HEALTH & WELFARE
as 1:2024cv00303
Plaintiff:
ROBERT W JOHNSON
Defendant:
WATERVILLE HEALTH & WELFARE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Supervisor Court Clerk, City Court, Syracuse, NY
as 1:2024cv00266
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Defendant:
Supervisor Court Clerk, City Court, Syracuse, NY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Latham Jr. v. Flynn et al
as 1:2024cv12195
Plaintiff:
Lincoln G. Latham Jr.
Defendant:
Frank Flynn, Shirley Lynch, Christian Alacron and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
JOHNSON v. REID
as 2:2024cv00301
Defendant:
JASON REID
Plaintiff:
ROBERT W JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Hotarek v. Motel North Conway, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00257
Plaintiff:
Robert Hotarek
Defendant:
Motel North Conway, Inc. doing business as Comfort Inn & Suites
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
A Woman's Concern, Inc. v. Healey et al
as 1:2024cv12131
Defendant:
Rebecca Hart Holder, Commissioner of DPH Robert Goldstein, Reproductive Equity Now, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
A Woman's Concern, Inc. doing business as Your Options Medical
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
