Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv10193
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794 Job Discrimination (Handicap)
Khairullah et. al. v Meyer et. al.
as 3:2023cv30095
Plaintiff:
Mohamed Khairullah, Michael Migliore, Nidal El-Takach and others
Defendant:
Johnathan Meyer, Patrick Lechleitner, Himamauli Das and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv11893
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Iglesias v. Sharif et al
as 3:2014cv30067
Plaintiff:
Christian Iglesias
Defendant:
Ahmad A. Sharif, Richard Ward, William J. Fitchet and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv12333
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
Ahmad v. Fulbright Pakistan Program Northeast Student Services Institute of International Education et al
as 1:2010cv11073
Plaintiff:
Munir Ahmad
Defendant:
Fulbright Pakistan Program Northeast Student Services Institute of International Education and United States Education Foundation in Pakistan Islamabad
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Henriquez v. Springfield et al
as 3:2009cv30232
Plaintiff:
Dionysio Henriquez
Defendant:
City of Springfield, Ahmad Shariff and Erwin Greene
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bakth V. City of Springfield, et al
as 3:2009cv30229
Plaintiff:
Anhar Bakth
Defendant:
City of Springfield , Erwin Greene and Ahmad Shariff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Caraballo et al v. Shariff et al
as 3:2009cv30155
Plaintiff:
Tomas Caraballo and Tomas Caraballo
Defendant:
City of Springfield, Ahmad Shariff, Erwin Greene and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
