Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Joseph v. DHL Express (USA) Inc.
as 1:2024cv11048
Plaintiff:
Jefferson Joseph
Defendant:
DHL Express (USA) Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01539
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv10744
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Perez-Garcia et al v. DHL Express (USA), Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv01167
Plaintiff:
Juan Carlos Perez-Garcia , Natalia Diaz-Sanchez and Community Property Regime comprised of Perez-Diaz
Defendant:
DHL Express (USA), Inc., King Fisher Air Service, Air Safari, Inc., Air St. Kitts Nevis (2005) Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Van Praag et al v. DHL Express (USA), Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv01128
Plaintiff:
Jacob G. Van Praag , Luz M. Molinari-Arroyo and Conjugal Partnership Van Praag-Molinari
Defendant:
DHL Express (USA), Inc., Air St. Kitts Nevis (2005) Limited, Richard V. Hurley and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
ERROR - NOT USED
as 3:2013cv01127
Plaintiff:
Jacob G. Van Praag, Luz M Molinari-Arroyo and Conjugal Partnership Van Praag-Molinari
Defendant:
DHL Express (USA), Inc., King Fisher Air Service, Air Safari, Inc., Air St. Kitts Nevis (2005) Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv01489
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv02153
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
