Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Ritrovato v. Eastern Bank et al
as 1:2023cv10713
Defendant:
John Aloise, Eastern Bank and Gordon DiMarzo
Plaintiff:
Nicholas A Ritrovato, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv30023
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv10806
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Renovators Supply, Inc. et al v. Eastern Franklin County Health District et al
as 3:2019cv30122
Plaintiff:
Michael Moulton, Eastern Franklin County Health District, Renovators Supply, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Claudia Lucas, Charles Kaniecki and Christopher Blair
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv30132
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1218
Cooper v. California Pizza 5th Floor et al
as 1:2015cv14202
Plaintiff:
John Cooper
Defendant:
California Pizza 5th Floor, Boston Medical Center, Au Bon Pain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv12949
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Adams v. Eastern Fisheries, Inc.,et.al.
as 1:2012cv12394
Plaintiff:
Frankie D. Adams
Defendant:
Eastern Fisheries, Inc., Roy Enoksen, O'Hara Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv11748
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Ragnar v. Silver et al
as 1:2009cv10147
Plaintiff:
Inar Ragnar
Defendant:
Elizabeth Silver, The Department of Transitional Assistance, The New England Housing Court and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
