Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01017
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01129
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
Quinones-Pimentel, et al v. Cannon, et al
as 22-1307
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DARWIN OSCAR QUINONES-PIMENTEL, VICTOR VEGA-ENCARNACION, NAICOM CORPORATION and others
Defendant / Appellee:
NICHOLAS WARREN CANNON, in his personal and individual capacity as Assistant United States Attorney for the District of Puerto Rico, DOUGLAS A. LEFF, in his personal and individual capacity as former FBI Special Agent in charge of San Juan Division, BRAD REX and others
Garcia-Rubiera, et al v. Fortuno, et al
as 12-2002
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GLADYS GARCIA-RUBIERA, DOMINGO A. CORPORAN-SUAREZ, ADALBERTO RODRIGUEZ and others
Defendant - Appellee:
LUIS FORTUNO, Governor and JUAN CARLOS PUIG-MORALES, Treasury Secretary
Defendant:
JUAN ANTONIO FLORES-GALARZA and SILA MARIA CALDERON
Gladys Garcia-Rubiera v. Luis Fortuno
as 10-2507
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GLADYS GARCIA-RUBIERA, DOMINGO A. CORPORAN-SUAREZ, ADALBERTO RODRIGUEZ and others
Defendant - Appellee:
LUIS FORTUNO and JUAN CARLOS PUIG-MORALES, Treasury Secretary
Defendant:
JUAN ANTONIO FLORES-GALARZA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-1924
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Garcia-Rubiera, et al v. Calderon, et al
as 07-2409
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GLADYS GARCIA-RUBIERA, DOMINGO A. CORPORAN-SUAREZ, ADALBERTO RODRIGUEZ and others
Defendant - Appellee:
SILA MARIA CALDERON, Governor of Puerto Rico, sued only in her official capacity as Governor and JUAN ANTONIO FLORES-GALARZA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
