Cases 131 - 140 of 2,606
Skerret-Hernandez v. Gonzalez-Ramos
as 3:2022cv01366
Plaintiff:
Omar Skerret-Hernandez
Defendant:
Edwin O. Gonzalez-Ramos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lopez-Lopez v. Metropolitan Detention Center Guaynabo
as 3:2022cv01363
Plaintiff:
Freddy Daniel Lopez-Lopez
Defendant:
Metropolitan Detention Center Guaynabo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cruz-Semprit v. Warden MDC Guaynabo
as 3:2022cv01365
Plaintiff:
Abraham Cruz-Semprit
Defendant:
Warden MDC Guaynabo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramos-Ramos v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2022cv01359
Petitioner:
Pedro J. Ramos-Ramos
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Michael Carvajal and Warden Serrano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Perez-Lopez v. Pierluisi-Urrutia
as 3:2022cv01354
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Perez-Lopez
Defendant:
Pedro Pierluisi-Urrutia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Larregui-Santiago v. Estados Unidos de America
as 3:2022cv01338
Plaintiff:
Hipolito Larregui-Santiago
Defendant:
Estados Unidos de America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Acevedo-Rodriguez v. USA
as 3:2022cv01334
Petitioner:
Brian Jeriel Acevedo-Rodriguez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Ortiz-Cintron v. USA
as 3:2022cv01329
Petitioner:
Roberto Ortiz-Cintron
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Berrios-Cotto v. USA
as 3:2022cv01327
Petitioner:
Alejandra Berrios-Cotto
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Escalera-Martinez v. USA
as 3:2022cv01323
Petitioner:
Eddie Escalera-Martinez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
