Cases 11 - 20 of 33
SALCEDO v. VITIELLO et al
as 2:2017cv00018
Plaintiff:
FRANKLIN SALCEDO
Defendant:
MICHAEL VITIELLO , MARIE GERRY , YVONNE PEABBLES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goldman v. US
as 16-2177
Petitioner - Appellant:
FRANKLIN M. GOLDMAN
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Villanueva v. Lanoie, et al
as 15-1417
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CESAR VILLANUEVA
Defendant:
FRANKLIN COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE and ERNIE LIACOPOLUS, Dentist
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID A. LANOIE, Superintendent, MARYLIN MORNINGSTAR, Medical Director, R.N., KEVIN BROWN, Assistant Superintendent of the Franklin County House of Correction and others
Abernathy v. Dewey et al
as 1:2015cv10431
Plaintiff:
Franklin B. Abernathy
Defendant:
Shawn Dewey, John Doe #1, Michael Rumery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Francilme v. Franklin Co. Sheriff's Office, et al
as 15-1077
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GREBERT FRANCILME
Defendant - Appellee:
LUIS S. SPENCER, DAVID A. LANOIE, DISCIPLINARY HEARING OFFICER and others
Martinez v. Franklin County House of Corrections et al
as 3:2014cv30201
Plaintiff:
Rigoberto Martinez
Defendant:
Franklin County House of Corrections, ICE and Eric H. Holder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Francilme v. Franklin County Sheriff's Office et al
as 3:2014cv30140
Plaintiff:
Grebert Francilme
Defendant:
Franklin County Sheriff's Office, Luis S. Spencer, David Lanoie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peters v. Northern NH Correctional Facility, Warden
as 1:2014fp00208
Respondent:
Northern NH Correctional Facility, Warden
Petitioner:
Franklin E. Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Goldman v. USA
as 1:2013cv12928
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Franklin M Goldman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Abernathy v. Gill et al
as 1:2013cv11805
Plaintiff:
Franklin B. Abernathy
Defendant:
Aaron D. Gill and Brian R. Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
