Cases 21 - 30 of 1,155
Banks v. Williams et al
as 1:2024cv00004
Plaintiff:
Christopher Banks
Defendant:
Williams, Rhode Island Department of Corrections and Lonciaux
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2024cv00026
Petitioner:
Daryl Williams
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Enwonwu v. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 1:2023cv00502
Plaintiff:
Francis Obiora Enwonwu
Defendant:
Department of Homeland Security and Wyatt Detention Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mello v. Salisbury et al
as 1:2023cv00499
Plaintiff:
Dustin Mello
Defendant:
Wayne T. Salisbury, J Mansello, Seth Crosby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hernandez Malave v. C.O. Moson et al
as 1:2023cv00524
Plaintiff:
Oneil Hernandez Malave
Defendant:
C.O. Moson, C.O. Peixoto, Lt. McDaniel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Washburn v. USA
as 1:2024cv00037
Petitioner:
Anthony Washburn
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Demos v. USA et al
as 1:2024cv00027
Petitioner:
John Robert Demos, Jr.
Respondent:
USA and Donald J. Trump
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00022
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Castillo v. R.I Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2023cv00503
Plaintiff:
Edwin Castillo
Defendant:
R.I Department of Corrections, CO Kayembe and Captain Macomber
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzalez v. USA
as 1:2023cv00520
Petitioner:
Jose Raul Gonzalez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
