Cases 41 - 50 of 88
Wall v. Medeiros
as 1:2015cv14167
Petitioner:
Gregory A Wall
Respondent:
Sean Medeiros
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Katopodis v. Elias et al
as 1:2015cv13817
Plaintiff:
Gregory John Katopodis
Defendant:
Nelson Elias and Darren Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norton v. Rodrigues et al
as 1:2015cv13216
Plaintiff:
Tyler Raymond Norton
Defendant:
Michael Rodrigues, Osvaldo Videl, Brian McDonald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wall v. Lubelczyk et al
as 1:2015cv12993
Plaintiff:
Gregory Wall
Defendant:
Rebecca Lubelczyk, Thomas Groblewski, Adrianna Carrillo, RN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wall v. Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
as 1:2014cv14389
Plaintiff:
Gregory Wall
Defendant:
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gorak v. FCI Berlin, Warden
as 1:2014cv00387
Respondent:
FCI Berlin, Warden
Petitioner:
Gregory Sean Gorak
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stote, et al v. Umass Correctional Health Care, et al
as 14-1827
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN E. STOTE
:
JAMES CYR and JOSE SIME
Plaintiff:
WAYNE D. CROSBY, TERRY CARTER, ENEZ KOLENVOVIC and others
Defendant - Appellee:
UMASS CORRECTIONAL HEALTHCARE, UMASS MEDICAL SCHOOL, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS and others
Evans v. Thompson et al
as 1:2014cv13024
Plaintiff:
John Evans
Defendant:
Michael Thompson, Dale Bissonnette, Keith Nano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Diatchenko v. UMass Correctional Health Care et al
as 1:2014cv12699
Plaintiff:
Gregory Diatchenko
Defendant:
UMass Correctional Health Care, UMass Medical School, Commonwealth of Massachusetts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cook v. UMass Correctional Health Care et al
as 1:2014cv12682
Plaintiff:
Gregory Cook
Defendant:
UMass Correctional Health Care, UMass Medical School, Commonwealth of Massachusetts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
