Cases 51 - 60 of 148
Widi v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 17-1292
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID J. WIDI, JR.
Defendant:
MICHELLE GONYEA, Case Management Coordinator, FCI Ray Brook, f/k/a FNU Gaunyea, FNU KUZNECOW, (first name unknown) Correctional Officer, FCI Berlin, K. LEWIS, Physician's Assistant, FCI Berlin and others
Defendant - Appellee:
E. L. TATUM, Warden, FCI Berlin, a/k/a Esker Lee Tatum, DAN SULLIVAN, Case Management Coordinator, FCI Berlin, WANDA MULLINS, Unit Manager, FCI Berlin and others
Interested Party:
BRIAN PATTERSON
Hernandez v. US
as 17-1306
Petitioner - Appellant:
ALFREDO HERNANDEZ
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Hernandez-Valentin v. USA
as 3:2017cv01343
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Pablo Hernandez-Valentin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Diaz-Hernandez v. USA
as 3:2017cv01293
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
George Diaz-Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Rios-Hernandez v. USA
as 3:2016cv03193
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Alvin Rios-Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Cruz-Berrios v. Puerto Rico Department of Correction and Rehabilitation et al
as 3:2016cv03155
Plaintiff:
Jose Julian Cruz-Berrios
Defendant:
Puerto Rico Department of Correction and Rehabilitation, Einar Ramos-Lopez, Lesty Borrero-Rivera and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Widi v. USA et al
as 1:2016fp00445
Defendant:
Mark Argir, Cory Balinas, B. Beegle and others
Plaintiff:
David J. Widi, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Hernandez v. Securus Technologies, Inc.
as 1:2016cv12402
Defendant:
Securus Technologies, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Aaron Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hernandez-Cotto v. USA
as 3:2016cv02988
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Johamid Hernandez-Cotto
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
ERROR-NOT USED
as 3:2016cv02876
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Nestor Class-Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
