Cases 51 - 60 of 224
Addison v. NH State Prison for Men, Acting Warden
as 1:2015cv00451
Plaintiff:
Michael K. Addison
Notice Only:
NH Attorney General - Notice Only - Habeas (Court Use Only) and NH Department of Corrections - Notice Only - Habeas (Court Use Only)
Respondent:
NH State Prison for Men, Acting Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cuffey v. FCI Berlin, Warden
as 1:2015fp00414
Petitioner:
Jamon K. Cuffey
Respondent:
FCI Berlin, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Peterson v. State of New Hampshire
as 15-1970
Petitioner - Appellant:
WARREN E. PETERSON, a/k/a Warren Erling Peterson
Respondent - Appellee:
STATE OF NH
Gordon v. Medeiro
as 15-1929
Petitioner - Appellant:
VENTREY GORDON, a/k/a Justice Mohammed
Respondent - Appellee:
SEAN MEDEIROS, Superintendent
Conley v. US
as 15-1875
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROBERT CONLEY, a/k/a Robert Lee Conley, a/k/a Keith Pinson
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Lopez v. US
as 15-1834
Petitioner - Appellant:
JUNIOR ALEXANDER LOPEZ, a/k/a Ace
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES
ESPOSITO v. LANDRY et al
as 2:2015cv00263
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL A ESPOSITO
Defendant:
SCOTT LANDRY, JOSEPH FITZPATRICK, WENDY RIEBE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hopkins, et al v. City of Calais Police Departme, et al
as 15-1661
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD HOPKINS and JAMES HOPKINS
Defendant:
CITY OF CALAIS POLICE DEPARTMENT, DAVID RANDALL, Chief, DWAYNE MCLELLON, a/k/a Duane McLellon and others
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID CLARONI, Officer
Arias v. US
as 15-1500
Petitioner - Appellant:
ESTHER ANGELICA ARIAS, a/k/a Jannette Cintron, a/k/a Gleiry Lopez, a/k/a Angelica Arias
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Rodriguez v. US
as 15-1393
Petitioner - Appellant:
CARLOS RODRIGUEZ, a/k/a Edwin Santiago
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
