Cases 61 - 70 of 98
Jaynes v. Mitchell
as 15-1342
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHARLES JAYNES
Respondent - Appellee:
LISA MITCHELL, as Superintendent of the Old Colony Correctional Center
Bobola v. NH Department of Corrections, Commissioner et al
as 1:2015fp00039
Plaintiff:
Matthew D. Bobola
Defendant:
Bernice Campbell, Celia Englander, Helen Hanks and others
Notice Only:
NH Attorney General - Notice Only - Civil (Court Use Only) and NH Department of Corrections - Notice Only - Civil (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wadlington v. Mitchell
as 1:2015cv10468
Plaintiff:
Vincent Wadlington
Defendant:
Lisa Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Labadie v. Mitchell
as 1:2015cv10137
Petitioner:
George Labadie
Respondent:
Lisa A. Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McCray v. Mitchell
as 14-2238
Petitioner - Appellant:
MARK MCCRAY
Respondent - Appellee:
LISA MITCHELL, Superintendent
Carr v. Colon, et al
as 14-2028
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RODOLFO CARR
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM COLON, MARLON MEDERO, KEVIN FOUNTAINE and others
Defendant:
BONNIE WERNER, HAROLD W. CLARKE, LUIS SPENCER and others
Price v. Mitchell
as 14-1843
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHARLES B. PRICE
Respondent - Appellee:
LISA MITCHELL, Superintendent at Old Colony Correctional Center
Riva v. Brasseur et al
as 1:2014cv13048
Plaintiff:
James Riva
Defendant:
Paul Brasseur, Mark Fogaren, Michael Carton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
[ANGE] v. BURKE et al
as 2:2014cv00286
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN MICHAEL [ANGE]
Defendant:
JOHN BURKE, MICHAEL FREEMAN, YORK COUNTY JAIL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HENDERSON v. THRASH et al
as 1:2014cv00202
Plaintiff:
KEITH HENDERSON
Defendant:
THOMAS W THRASH, JR, STEPHEN J MURPHY, III, CAROL COHRON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
