Cases 1 - 10 of 83
Levesque v. Storie et al
as 4:2024cv40083
Plaintiff:
Andre Rene Levesque
Defendant:
Gregory P Storie, Letitia James, Julia Kaplan Toce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pinney v. Bridgewater State Hospital, et al
as 23-2077
Plaintiff:
JOHNATHAN PINNEY, a/k/a Gitapushy Val Angel
Defendant:
BRIDGEWATER STATE HOSPITAL, DR. NIKHIL MATHEWS, CITY OF BOSTON and others
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, SUMBUL SIDDIQUI, Mayor, CHRISTINE ELOW and others
Taylor v. AbbVie Inc.
as 23-1678
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THEODORE WILLIAM TAYLOR, a/k/a Tad Taylor
Defendant / Appellee:
ABBOTT PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and ABBVIE INC.
LOVELY v. USA
as 1:2023cv00288
Petitioner:
TAYLOR LOVELY
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
LOVELY v. USA
as 1:2023cv00216
Petitioner:
TAYLOR LOVELY
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Taylor v. FCI Berlin, Warden
as 1:2023cv00150
Petitioner:
Dione Taylor
Respondent:
FCI Berlin, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Taylor v. Shire Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
as 1:2022cv10430
Plaintiff:
Tad Taylor
Defendant:
Shire Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Abbott Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
as 4:2022cv40047
Plaintiff:
Tad Taylor
Defendant:
Abbott Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Mitchell
as 1:2022cv10183
Petitioner:
Mark E. Taylor
Respondent:
Lisa Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Taylor v. Sackler et al
as 1:2022cv10226
Plaintiff:
Tad Taylor
Defendant:
Richard Sackler, Purdue Pharmaceuticals, LP and The Sackler Family Trust
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
