Cases 1 - 10 of 82
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv12337
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Scott v. Department of Justice et al
as 1:2024fp00209
Petitioner:
Adam Scott
Respondent:
Department of Justice and A. McCormack
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Williams v. Department of Justice
as 1:2024fp00201
Plaintiff:
Jay Williams
Defendant:
Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Duarte v. Department of Justice, et al
as 24-1543
Defendant:
NATHANIEL M. GORTON, JEANIE LEIDER, RACHEL ROLLINS and others
Plaintiff:
ERIC J. DUARTE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01225
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Duarte v. Department of Justice, et al
as 24-1367
Plaintiff:
ERIC J. DUARTE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, PATRICK W. MCDERMOTT, Acting Sheriff, Norfolk County Sheriff's Office, DANIELLE FRANE, Superintendent, Norfolk County Sheriff's Office and others
Duarte v. Department of Justice et al
as 1:2023cv12677
Plaintiff:
Eric J Duarte
Defendant:
Department of Justice, Sheriff Patrick W. McDermott, Superintendent Danielle Frane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Duarte v. Department of Justice et al
as 1:2023cv12388
Plaintiff:
Eric J. Duarte
Defendant:
Department of Justice, Sheriff Patrick W. McDermott, Superintendent Danielle Frane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. US Department of Justice
as 1:2023cv00363
Petitioner:
Adam Scott
Respondent:
US Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv10706
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
