Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Mahdi v. Ryan et al
as 3:2023cv30040
Plaintiff:
Abdul Jaleel Mahdi, Irvin and Irvin William Jones
Defendant:
Mathew Ryan, Jr., Dianme F. Dillon, Francis John Good and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
STOKES v. MVCF CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 1:2022cv00202
Plaintiff:
LEVI STOKES
Defendant:
MVCF CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, CPL MANUEL SILVEIRA, JR and CAPTAIN DONALD W DILLON, JR
Not Classified By Court:
MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - PRISONER CASES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Widi v. USA et al
as 1:2016fp00445
Defendant:
Mark Argir, Cory Balinas, B. Beegle and others
Plaintiff:
David J. Widi, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Dillon v. Grondolsky
as 4:2012cv40082
Petitioner:
Grover L. Dillon, Sr.
Respondent:
Jeffery Grondolsky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Dillon v. Dickhaut et al
as 1:2012cv10713
Plaintiff:
David Dillon
Defendant:
Thomas Dickhaut, Anthony Mendonsa, Osvaldo Vidal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barbosa v. Dillon, et al
as 12-1433
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICARDO BARBOSA
Defendant - Appellee:
SERGEANT DILLON, MICHAEL BELLOTTI, JOSEPH TESCANO and others
Barbosa v. Dillon, et al
as 1:2011cv11524
Plaintiff:
Ricardo M. Barbosa
Defendant:
Dillon of N.C.S.O., Michael G. Bellotti, Joseph Tescano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coleman v. Salem, NH, Town of, et al.
as 1:2010cv00132
Defendant:
Chad Clark, Paul T. Donovan and Salem, NH, Town of
Plaintiff:
Dillon Coleman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ruston v. US, et al
as 09-2579
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LESTER JON RUSTON
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES, JAMES K. ELLIS, TOM SCHNEIDER and others
Ruston v. Hardy, et al
as 09-1032
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LESTER JON RUSTON
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID HARDY, JAMES K. ELLIS, E. DANIELLE ALEMAN and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
