Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Fisherman v. NH Department of Corrections, Commissioner et al
as 1:2023cv00349
Plaintiff:
Leonard James Fisherman, Jr.
Defendant:
NH Department of Corrections, Commissioner, NH Department of Corrections, Warden, John Doe #1 and others
Not Classified By Court:
NH Attorney General - Notice Only - Civil (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Fisherman v. Doe 1 et al
as 1:2022cv00246
Defendant:
Michael Paul, John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Plaintiff:
Leonard James Fisherman, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abernathy v. Dewey et al
as 1:2015cv10431
Plaintiff:
Franklin B. Abernathy
Defendant:
Shawn Dewey, John Doe #1, Michael Rumery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smitherman v. Stevenson et al
as 1:2013cv10161
Plaintiff:
Harold Smitherman
Defendant:
Anthony J. Stevenson, Matthew M. Wisnewski, Matthew Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davenport v. Massachusetts Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2012cv11013
Plaintiff:
Andrew A Davenport
Defendant:
Massachusetts Department of Corrections, Luis Spencer, Veronica Madden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Francis v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2011cv01751
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Plaintiff:
Fenyang O. Francis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv10253
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Abernathy v. Dickhaut, et al
as 1:2010cv11504
Plaintiff:
Franklin B. Abernathy
Defendant:
Thomas Dickhaut, Anthony Mendonsa, Robert J. Blood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Dickhaut et al
as 1:2010cv11116
Plaintiff:
Robert Williams
Defendant:
Thomas Dickhaut, Anthony Mendonsa, Brian Bonse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
