Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Cryer v. MA Department of Correction, et al
as 13-1331
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEREK SINCERE CRYER
Defendant - Appellee:
MA DEPT. OF CORRECTION, HAROLD W. CLARKE, CHRISTOPHER MITCHELL and others
Defendant:
JAMES R. BENDER and RONALD T. DUVAL
Interested Party:
JOHN DIAZ
Scoggins v. Hall
as 12-2338
Petitioner - Appellant:
ALLEN SCOGGINS, a/k/a Allen Alston
Respondent - Appellee:
TIMOTHY HALL
Costa v. Hall, et al
as 11-1025
Petitioner - Appellant:
LOUIS R. COSTA
Respondent - Appellee:
TIMOTHY HALL, Superintendent, Massachusetts Correctional Institute and THOMAS REILLY
Cryer v. MA Department of Corrections, et al
as 11-1009
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEREK SINCERE CRYER DEREK SINCERE BLACK WOLF CRYER
Defendant - Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, HAROLD W. CLARKE, CHRISTOPHER MITCHELL and others
Defendant:
JAMES R. BENDER and RONALD T. DUVAL
Williams v. Hager et al
as 1:2009cv12001
Plaintiff:
Thomas Williams
Defendant:
D. J. Hager, Unknown "mental health watch officer", Massaschusetts Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moniz v. Hall et al
as 1:2009cv11645
Plaintiff:
Glenn Moniz
Defendant:
Timothy Hall, Luis Spencer, Michael Lyons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fowlkes v. Dennehy, et al
as 09-1057
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FELIPE OTEZE FOWLKES
Defendant - Appellee:
KATHLEEN M. DENNEHY, Commissioner, JAMES R. BENDER, Assistant Deputy Commissioner, TIMOTHY HALL, Assistant Deputy Commissioner and others
Yeboah-Sefah v. Maloney, et al
as 08-2301
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL YEBOAH-SEFAH
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL T. MALONEY, LUIS S. SPENCER, TIMOTHY HALL and others
:
Spencer, Jr. v. Bender et al
as 1:2008cv11528
Plaintiff:
Barry H. Spencer, Jr.
Defendant:
James Bender, Harold Clark, Timothy Hall and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Rice v. Hall
as 07-2660
Petitioner - Appellant:
JORDAN M. RICE
Respondent - Appellee:
TIMOTHY HALL
:
and
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
