Cases 51 - 60 of 75
United States of America v. $300,000.00 in United States Currency, seized from Bank of America Account No. 898012028509
as 4:2010cv40183
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$300,000.00 in United States Currency, seized from Bank of America Account No. 898012028509
Claimant:
Inversiones Corosopando S.A.
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 781
United States of America v. $70,000.00 in United States Currency seized from Bank of America Account No. 898004313028
as 4:2010cv40152
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$70,000.00 in United States Currency, seized from Bank of America Account No. 898004313028
Claimant:
Galm Securities Corporation
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 781
United States of America v. $1,000,000.00 in United States Currency, Seized from Bank of America Account No. 898012028525
as 4:2010cv40121
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$1,000,000.00 in United States Currency, Seized from Bank of America Account No. 898012028525
Claimant:
Troy Resources, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 781
United States of America v. $600,000 in United States Currency, seized from Bank of America Account No. 898012029485
as 4:2010cv40110
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$600,000 in United States Currency, seized from Bank of America Account No. 898012029485
Claimant:
Uno Capital Management Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 781
United States of America v. $200,000 in United States Currency, seized from Bank of America account no. 898018373009
as 4:2010cv40097
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$200,000 in United States Currency, seized from Bank of America account no. 898018373009
Claimant:
Rosemont V Corporation and Ventrade, B.V.
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 781
US v. Landron-Class, et al
as 10-1435
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
REYNALDO LANDRON-CLASS
Defendant:
FARMACIA CARIMAS, Ave. Boulevard, Esq. Gautier Benitez EB-1, Levittown, Toa Baja, FARMACIA BONEVILLE, Ave. Degetau, A-17 Caguas, Puerto Rico, URB. VILLA DEL RIO ESTE, E-10 SECC DOS RIOS, Catano, Puerto Rico and others
Claimant:
BANCO POPULAR DE PUERTO RICO, BANCO SANTANDER PUERTO RICO, RG MORTGAGE CORPORATION and others
Interested Party:
AGUSTIN RIOS-RAMOS
United States of America v. $1,000,000.00 In United States Currency, Seized from Bank of America Account No. XXXXXXXX2320
as 4:2010cv40027
Plaintiff:
United States of America and United States of America
Defendant:
$1,000,000.00 In United States Currency, Seized from Bank of America Account No. XXXXXXXX2320
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1341 Complaint for Forfeiture
United States of America v. $324,619.59 In United States Currency, Seized from Bank of America Account No. XXXXXXXX7568 et al
as 4:2010cv40026
Plaintiff:
United States of America and United States of America
Defendant:
$324,619.59 In United States Currency, Seized from Bank of America Account No. XXXXXXXX7568, $362,747.00 In United States Currency, Seized From Bank of America Account No. XXXXXXXX3054 and $212,633.41 In United States Currency, Seized from Bank of America Account No. XXXXXXXX3067
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1341 Complaint for Forfeiture
United States of America v. $7,500,000.00 in United States Currency, seized from Bank of America Account No. XXXXXXXX2511
as 4:2009cv40224
Plaintiff:
United States of America, United States of America and United States of America
Defendant:
$7,500,000.00 in United States Currency, seized from Bank of America Account No. XXXXXXXX2511
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1341 Complaint for Forfeiture
United States of America v. $250,000.00 in United States Currency, seized from Bank of America accounts nos. XXXXXXXX7681 & XXXXXXXX7694
as 4:2009cv40225
Plaintiff:
United States of America and United States of America
Defendant:
$250,000.00 in United States Currency, seized from Bank of America accounts nos. XXXXXXXX7681 & XXXXXXXX7694
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
