Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Austin v. Ken's Foods, Inc.
as 4:2024cv40040
Plaintiff:
David Austin
Defendant:
Ken's Foods, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Austin v. Ken's Foods, Inc.
as 1:2024cv10560
Plaintiff:
David Austin
Defendant:
Ken's Foods, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Haughn v. United of Omaha Life Insurance Company
as 1:2020cv11826
Defendant:
Austin Preparatory School Long Term Disability Plan and United of Omaha Life Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Kathryn Haughn
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Smith et al v CRST Expedited, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv11353
Defendant:
CRST Expedited, Inc. and CRST International, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jose Torres Rosado, Jean Paul Bricault Jr, Maurice Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Austin v. Southstream Seafoods, Inc.
as 1:2020cv00253
Defendant:
Southstream Seafoods, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Ruben Austin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Austin v. DoorDash, Inc.
as 20-1217
Defendant / Appellee:
DOORDASH, INC.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DARNELL AUSTIN, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
GLODEN et al v. LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 2:2018cv00098
Plaintiff:
LEVI GLODEN , AUSTIN GLODEN and SAWYER GLODEN
Defendant:
LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY , BANCROFT CONTRACTING CORPORATION and GROUP LIFE AND ACCIDENT DEATH AND DISMEMBERMENT INSURANCE FOR EMPLOYEES OF BANCROFT CONTRACTING COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Austin v. DoorDash, Inc.
as 1:2017cv12498
Plaintiff:
Darnell Austin
Defendant:
DoorDash, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
AUSTIN v. AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 1:2016cv00177
Plaintiff:
BEDINA J AUSTIN
Defendant:
AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Murillo v. The Bertram Inn, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv10574
Defendant:
The Bertram Inn, Inc., OOA, Inc. and Bryan R. Austin
Plaintiff:
Carmen Murillo
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
