Cases 91 - 97 of 97
Garrett v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv02306
Plaintiff:
Mashell Garrett
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Patillo et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc et al
as 1:2008cv00009
Plaintiff:
Lois Patillo, Rhonda Beaver, Larry Campbell and others
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc and Davol, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Product Liability
Allen et al v.Pfizer, Inc.
as 1:2007cv11795
Plaintiff:
Jessie Allen, Mary Adams, Nathan Adams and others
Defendant:
Pfizer, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Adrion v. Knight et al
as 1:2007cv11277
Plaintiff:
George J Adrion
Defendant:
Garrett Knight and Retail Expert Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Connectu, Inc. v. Facebook, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv10593
Special Master:
George C. Fisher
Plaintiff:
Connectu, Inc., Cameron Winklevoss, Tyler Winklevoss and others
Defendant:
Facebook, Inc., Mark Zuckerberg, Eduardo Saverin and others
Not Classified By Court:
Jeffrey Parmet
Interested Party:
02138 and Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett, & Dunner, LLP
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
In Re: Webloyalty.com, Inc., Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation
as 1:2007md01820
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Joe W. Kuefler, Joe W. Kuefler, Joe W. Kuefler and others
Defendant:
Webloyalty.com, Inc., Webloyalty.com, Inc., Webloyalty.com, Inc. and others
Special Master:
Gael Mahony
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Neri, et al v. PL Capital, LLC, et al
as 1:2003cv10179
Plaintiff:
Nancy D. Neri, Gregory W. Boulos, Paul E. Bulman and others
Defendant:
PL Capital, LLC, Richard Lashley, Lawrence B. Seidman and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
Terence D. Kenney, Central Co-Operative Bank Employee Stock Ownership Plan Trust and Joseph R. Doherty Family Limited Partnership, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 151 Federal Communications Act of 1934
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
