Cases 91 - 100 of 1,641
Jorgensen v. Jorgensen, et al
as 23-1408
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN SCOTT JORGENSEN
Defendant / Appellee:
PETER JORGENSEN, KATHY JORGENSEN, a/k/a Anne Katherine Jorgensen, ROBERT B. GREGORY and others
FROST v. FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION et al
as 2:2023cv00198
Plaintiff:
KEVIN B. FROST
Defendant:
FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION and BROCK & SCOTT PLLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
SCOTT v. CARRINGTON MORTGAGE SERVICES LLC
as 2:2023cv00193
Plaintiff:
VON SCOTT
Defendant:
CARRINGTON MORTGAGE SERVICES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Cannon v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Massachusetts, Inc.
as 1:2023cv10950
Plaintiff:
Scott Cannon
Defendant:
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Massachusetts, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.
Michael C. Pizzuto v. Homology Medicines, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv10858
Plaintiff:
Michael C. Pizzuto
Defendant:
Homology Medicines, Inc., Arthur O. Tzianabos, W. Bradford Smith and others
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Ertz, Scott Boyd, Kasey Kahne and others
IN RE: SCOTT L. FENSTERMAKER, ESQ.
as 2:2023cv00174
Respondent:
BOARD OF OVERSEERS OF THE BAR
Petitioner:
SCOTT L FENSTERMAKER, ESQ
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv10841
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Sanchez v. Harmon
as 1:2023cv00153
Plaintiff:
Daniela A. Sanchez
Defendant:
Andrew Scott Harmon
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 191 Bank Foreclosure
NORTHERN MAINE MEDICAL CENTER v. DRUMMOND, DO
as 1:2023cv00164
Plaintiff:
NORTHERN MAINE MEDICAL CENTER
Defendant:
SCOTT DRUMMOND, DO, JR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
Scott v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
as 1:2023cv10569
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey R. Scott
Defendant:
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
