Cases 11 - 20 of 1,649
US v. Lara-Martinez
as 24-1288
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
ALDRIN MANUEL LARA-MARTINEZ
Fonseca et al v. San Jorge Children's Hospital Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv01113
Plaintiff:
Monica Fonseca and Monica Valentina Martinez
Defendant:
San Jorge Children's Hospital Inc., Continental Insurance Company, Robert Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
US v. Ayala-Martinez
as 24-1179
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
ANGELA AYALA-MARTINEZ, a/k/a Sealed Defendant 1, a/k/a La Vieja, a/k/a La Senora
Martinez Lebron v. Reyes Rosado et al
as 3:2024cv01045
Plaintiff:
Roberto Martinez Lebron and Update Music, Corp.
Defendant:
Carlos Efren Reyes Rosado, Kairy Lopez, Reyes-Lopez Conjugal Partnership and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
US v. Kelly-Martinez
as 24-1079
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
BRIGIDO KELLY-MARTINEZ
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01018
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Duarte De Martinez v. Garland
as 24-1057
Petitioner:
KATHYA ROXANA DUARTE DE MARTINEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
US v. Burgos-Martinez
as 24-1005
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
HERIBERTO BURGOS-MARTINEZ, a/k/a Spowell, a/k/a Spo, a/k/a La Cabra
Pineda-Martinez v. FCI Berlin, Warden
as 1:2023cv00555
Petitioner:
Frixon Eduardo Pineda-Martinez
Respondent:
FCI Berlin, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Delgado-Martinez et al v. Velez-Padilla et al
as 3:2023cv01622
Plaintiff:
LUCAS DELGADO-MARTINEZ and CRISTINA MARTINEZ-GUZMAN
Defendant:
REY VELEZ-PADILLA, ISLAND SPORTS EVENTS LLC, Mapfre Praico Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
