Cases 11 - 20 of 2,611
In Re: Santiago-Lugo
as 24-1373
Petitioner:
ISRAEL SANTIAGO-LUGO, a/k/a El Doctor
Respondent:
UNITED STATES
Interested Party:
JOSE ANIBAL CABRANES, TEXACO PUERTO RICO, INC., BANCO POPULAR DE PUERTO RICO, as claimant of One Urban Lot #72, located at Ibiza St., Paseo Las Brisas, RP. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1322
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Asociacion de Detallistas de Gasolina de PR Inc., et al v. Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, et al
as 24-1188
Plaintiff:
ASOCIACION DE DETALLISTAS DE GASOLINA DE PUERTO RICO, INC., A&E SERVICE STATION, INC., ANTONIO JUAN LEON and others
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO, represented by its Governor Hon. Pedro Pierluisi Urrutia, HON. DOMINGO EMANUELLI HERNANDEZ, as Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, HON. HIRAM TORRES MONTALVO, as Interim Secretary of the Department of Consumer Affairs of Puerto Rico and others
In Re: Gonzalez Diaz
as 24-8009
Respondent:
DALIA STELLA GONZALEZ DIAZ
Interested Party:
PR SUPREME COURT
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01017
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
Correa-Lopez v. Gonzalez-Ramos
as 3:2024cv01006
Plaintiff:
Eduardo Correa-Lopez
Defendant:
Edwin O. Gonzalez-Ramos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Noel v. Romelus, et al
as 23-2058
Plaintiff:
ARNOLD A. NOEL, on behalf of himself and A.G.N. and B.M.N.
Defendant:
BARTHINE ROMELUS, PAUL M. CRONAN, BRAILEY E. NEWTON and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01029
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
US v. Gonzalez-Rivera
as 24-1121
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
ALVIN GONZALEZ-RIVERA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
