Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00022
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv10195
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv40085
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv13437
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv10482
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv30183
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv11925
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Sandoval v. Chertoff, et al
as 08-1796
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NANCY C. SANDOVAL
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF, as Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, DENIS C. RIORDAN, Director USCIS Boston District Office, EMILIO T. GONZALEZ, Director of the U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services and others
Sabbat v. Mukasey et al
as 1:2008cv10808
Petitioner:
Jean Ehwin Sabbat
Respondent:
Michael B. Mukasey, U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv10528
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
