Cases 11 - 20 of 889
Edwards v. 1st Source Bank
as 1:2024cv10690
Plaintiff:
Patricia Edwards
Defendant:
1st Source Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Cooper v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2024cv10680
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Edward Cooper
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Groden v. North American Leasing Inc.
as 1:2024cv10566
Plaintiff:
Edward F. Groden
Defendant:
North American Leasing Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Humphrey v. California Highway Patrol
as 1:2024cv10575
Plaintiff:
Thomas Edward Humphrey
Defendant:
California Highway Patrol
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv40033
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Ecker v. Covidien L.P. et al
as 1:2024cv10425
Plaintiff:
Edward Gerald Ecker
Defendant:
Covidien L.P. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Edward F. Groden v. Deering Construction, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv10393
Plaintiff:
Edward F. Groden, Executive Director of the New England Teamsters Pension Fund and Edward F. Groden
Defendant:
Deering Construction, Inc. and Daniel J. Deering, IV
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Mazza v. City Of Boston et al
as 1:2024cv10333
Plaintiff:
Anthony Mazza
Defendant:
City Of Boston, Frank J. Olbrys, Edward Kennealy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Humphrey v. Douglas Prosecuting Attorney
as 1:2024cv10331
Plaintiff:
Thomas Edward Humphrey
Defendant:
Douglas Prosecuting Attorney
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Edward F. Groden, Executive Director of the New England Teamsters Pension Fund v. Krupen Epstein
as 1:2024cv10303
Plaintiff:
Edward F. Groden
Defendant:
Dina Krupen Epstein
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
