Cases 11 - 20 of 131
Mahdi v. Ryan et al
as 3:2023cv30040
Plaintiff:
Abdul Jaleel Mahdi, Irvin and Irvin William Jones
Defendant:
Mathew Ryan, Jr., Dianme F. Dillon, Francis John Good and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Commonwealth Real Estate Holdings, LLC et al v. Andersen Tax LLC et al
as 1:2022cv11974
Plaintiff:
Commonwealth Real Estate Holdings, LLC, Henry R Lewis and Lewis Capital Fund, LLC
Defendant:
Andersen Tax LLC and James E Goode
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Good v. Gray
as 22-1764
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOHN J. GOOD, JR.
Respondent / Appellee:
DEAN GRAY, Warden
The Life is Good Company et al v. Hitel Technologies LLC
as 1:2022cv11467
Plaintiff:
The Life is Good Company and Constructor.io Corporation
Defendant:
Hitel Technologies LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Larkin v. Dick's Sporting Goods, Inc.
as 1:2022cv11133
Plaintiff:
Carol Larkin
Defendant:
Dick's Sporting Goods, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Mendez-Morales v. Marshalls, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv01065
Plaintiff:
Rocio Mendez-Morales
Defendant:
Marshalls, Inc., Marshalls Home Goods Plaza del Este, Joel Molina and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
New Balance Athletics, Inc. v. Peruvian Sporting Goods S.A.C.
as 1:2022cv10170
Plaintiff:
New Balance Athletics, Inc.
Defendant:
Peruvian Sporting Goods S.A.C.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Buds Goods & Provisions Corp. v. HSBC Bank USA, N.A.
as 4:2022cv40002
Plaintiff:
Buds Goods & Provisions Corp.
Defendant:
HSBC Bank USA, N.A., John Doe and Lam Yan Wun Merton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
US v. Cadden
as 21-2003
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
BARRY J. CADDEN
Interested Party:
MATTHEW CADDEN, EMILIA CADDEN, E. R. CADDEN and others
Good v. Gray
as 1:2021cv11812
Petitioner:
John J Good, Jr
Respondent:
Warden Dean Gray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
