Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Rubin, et al v. Harvard University, et al
as 11-2144
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JENNY RUBIN, DEBORAH RUBIN, DANIEL MILLER and others
Defendant - Appellee:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, IRANIAN MINISTRY OF INFORMATION AND SECURITY, AYATOLLAH ALI HOSEINI KHAMENEI and others
Trustee - Appellee:
HARVARD UNIVERSITY and MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS
ERROR - NOT USED
as 3:2011cv01505
Plaintiff:
Iran E. Feliciano-Matos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Feliciano v. United States of America
as 3:2011cv01506
Plaintiff:
Iran Feliciano-Matos
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv01194
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Porras-Soto et al v. Ryder Memorial Hospital, Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv01502
Plaintiff:
Rafael Porras-Soto , Jon Porras-Hernandez , Jason Porras-Hernandez and others
Defendant:
Ryder Memorial Hospital, Inc., Department of Justice, Commonwealth of PR, Department of Health Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
US v. Feliciano-Matos
as 09-2315
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
IRAN E. FELICIANO-MATOS, a/k/a Hiran, a/k/a Hiram
Rubin, et al v. Islamic Republic of Iran, et al
as 08-8020
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
JENNY RUBIN, DEBORAH RUBIN, DANIEL MILLER and others
Defendant - Respondent:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, IRANIAN MINISTRY OF INFORMATION AND SECURITY, AYATOLLAH ALI HOSEINI KHAMENEI and others
Trustee - Respondent:
HARVARD UNIVERSITY and MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS
Rubin, et al v. Harvard University, et al
as 08-8021
Plaintiff - Respondent:
ABRAHAM MENDELSON, STUART E. HERSCH, RENAY FRYM and others
Defendant - Respondent:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, IRANIAN MINISTRY OF INFORMATION AND SECURITY, AYATOLLAH ALI HOSEINI KHAMENEI and others
Trustee - Petitioner:
HARVARD UNIVERSITY and MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
