Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Strahan v. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Administrator et al
as 1:2018cv00752
Defendant:
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Administrator and National Marine Fisheries Service, Assistant Administrator
Plaintiff:
Richard Maximus Strahan
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538
Maine Council of the Atlantic, et al v. National Marine Fisheries, et al
as 16-2155
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MAINE COUNCIL OF THE ATLANTIC SALMON FEDERATION, NATURAL RESOURCES COUNCIL OF MAINE, KENNEBEC VALLEY CHAPTER OF TROUT UNLIMITED and others
Defendant - Appellee:
NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE, of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA Fisheries), BROOKFIELD RENEWABLE SERVICES MAINE, LLC, BROOKFIELD POWER US ASSET MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
Goethel, et al v. US Dept of Commerce, et al
as 16-2103
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID GOETHEL and XIII NORTHEAST FISHERY SECTOR, INC.
Defendant - Appellee:
US DEPT OF COMMERCE, PENNY PRITZKER, in her official capacity as Secretary, US Department of Commerce, KATHRYN SULLIVAN, in her official capacity as Administrator, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and others
Goethel et al v. US Department of Commerce, Secretary et al
as 1:2015cv00497
Plaintiff:
David Goethel and XIII Northeast Fishery Sector, Inc.
Defendant:
National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Eileen Sobeck and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Maritime Subsidy Board
Commonwealth of MA Office of the Attorney General v. Blank et al
as 1:2013cv11301
Plaintiff:
Commonwealth of Massachusetts Office of The Attorney General
Defendant:
Rebecca Blank , United States Department of Commerce , Kathryn D Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Tempest Fisheries, et al v. Locke, et al
as 11-2001
Plaintiff:
JAMES LOVGREN, NEW BEDFORD, MA, NEW HAMPSHIRE COMMERICAL FISHERMEN'S ASSOCIATION and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TEMPEST FISHERIES, LTD, GRACE FISHING, INC., ROANOKE FISH CO., INC. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
GARY F LOCKE, Secretary of Commerce, NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION, (NOAA), NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE and others
Interested Party:
BARNEY FRANK, JOHN F. TIERNEY, DEVAL PATRICK and others
New Hampshire Commercial, et al v. Locke, et al
as 11-1987
Plaintiff:
JAMES LOVGREN, NEW BEDFORD, MA, PAUL THERIAULT and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NEW HAMPSHIRE COMMERICAL FISHERMEN'S ASSOCIATION, DAVID ARIPOTCH, RICHARD GRACHEK and others
Defendant - Appellee:
GARY F LOCKE, Secretary of Commerce, NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION, (NOAA), NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE and others
Interested Party:
BARNEY FRANK, JOHN F. TIERNEY, DEVAL PATRICK and others
Lovgren v. Locke, et al
as 11-1964
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES LOVGREN
Plaintiff:
NEW BEDFORD, MA, NEW HAMPSHIRE COMMERICAL FISHERMEN'S ASSOCIATION, PAUL THERIAULT and others
Defendant - Appellee:
GARY F LOCKE, Secretary of Commerce, NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION, (NOAA), NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE and others
Interested Party:
BARNEY FRANK, JOHN F. TIERNEY, DEVAL PATRICK and others
City of New Bedford, et al v. Locke, et al
as 11-1952
Plaintiff:
JAMES LOVGREN, NEW HAMPSHIRE COMMERICAL FISHERMEN'S ASSOCIATION, PAUL THERIAULT and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NEW BEDFORD, MA and GLOUCESTER, MA
Defendant - Appellee:
JANE LUBCHENCO, Administrator of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, GARY F LOCKE, Secretary of Commerce, NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION, (NOAA) and others
Interested Party:
BARNEY FRANK, JOHN F. TIERNEY, DEVAL PATRICK and others
LOVGREN v. LOCKE et al
as 1:2010cv11168
Plaintiff:
JAMES LOVGREN
Defendant:
Gary Locke , THE NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION (NOAA) and THE NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE (NMFS)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
