Cases 11 - 17 of 17
ACM Palmyra CFL, LLC v. Rodriguez Estela et al
as 3:2011cv01746
Defendant:
Orlando Rodriguez-Estela, Ileana Torres-Lopez and Conjugal Partnership Rodriguez-Torres
Plaintiff:
ACM Palmyra CFL, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-2534
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cordero-Suarez v. Rodriguez et al
as 3:2009cv01586
Plaintiff:
Wanda Cordero-Suarez
Defendant:
Orlando Rodriguez, Angel A. Ortiz-Garcia, Fabian Serrano and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Pramco CV9, LLC v. Rodriguez-Estella et al
as 3:2008cv01963
Plaintiff:
Pramco CV9, LLC
Defendant:
Orlando Rodriguez-Estella, Ileana Torres-Lopez and Conjugal Partnership Rodriguez-Torres
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Salvucci, Sr., et al v. The Watertown Police Departmen, et al
as 08-1711
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANK SALVUCCI, SR. and FRANK SALVUCCI, JR.
Plaintiff:
CHAPTER 7 TRUSTEE STEWART F. GROSSMAN
Defendant:
WATERTOWN POLICE DEPARTMENT, POLICE CHIEF EDWARD DEVEAU, JOSEPH DEIGNAN and others
Defendant - Appellee:
KEITH PARENT and ORLANDO RODRIGUEZ
Rodriguez v. Suzuki Motor Corp., et al
as 07-2662
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ORLANDO RODRIGUEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
SUZUKI MOTOR CORPORATION and INSURANCE COMPANY X
United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company v. Puerto Rico Highway and Transportation Authority et al
as 3:2007cv01169
Plaintiff:
United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company, United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company and United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company
Defendant:
Puerto Rico Highway and Transportation Authority, Kaiser Construction, Inc., Eurobank and others
Counter Claimant:
Kaiser Construction, Inc.
Cross Claimant:
Eurobank
Cross Defendant:
Alberto Rodriguez-Bacallao, Marta Cecilia Perez, Conjugal Partnership Rodriguez-Perez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
