Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Morales Rojas v. Demos
as 1:2019cv10459
Plaintiff:
Carlos L. Morales Rojas
Defendant:
George Demos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Morales Rojas v. Demos
as 3:2019cv10459
Plaintiff:
Carlos L. Morales Rojas
Defendant:
George Demos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
In Re Attorney Disciplinary Proceedings
as 1:2017mc91394
Movant:
Robert M. Farrell
Respondent:
Jasmin Rojas
Cause Of Action: Referral from BK Court - Attorney Discipline
J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Rosa et al
as 1:2016cv12261
Plaintiff:
J & J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Trijido Rosa, Richardo Rojas and Melinda Industrial Group Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation v. Chapman et al
as 3:2016cv30063
Plaintiff:
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation
Defendant:
Doris A. Chapman, Paul Chapman, Dwayne South and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Rojas-Lozano v. Google, Inc.
as 3:2015cv10160
Defendant:
Google, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Gabriela Rojas-Lozano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rojas v. Boston Scientific Corp. et al
as 1:2014cv10671
Plaintiff:
Madeline Rojas
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corp., Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dipre-Rojas et al v. Yankee Construction, Inc. et al
as 4:2012cv40049
Defendant:
Yankee Construction, Inc., Union Building Local 1321 and Occupational Health & Safety Administration
Plaintiff:
Pedro Dipre-Rojas , Claudio A Sosa , Jorge Alvarez and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Brodin v. Rojas et al
as 4:2011cv40179
Plaintiff:
Kristin Brodin
Defendant:
David Rojas, Ramon Roman, James Powers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Sneade et al v. Gemme et al
as 4:2011cv40061
Defendant:
Gary J. Gemme, Mark Rojas, City of Worcester and others
Plaintiff:
Dana Sneade , Sharde Russell and Elijah Williamson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
