Cases 11 - 20 of 22
HURD v. BURNHAM CORPORATION et al
as 1:2011cv00392
Plaintiff:
LINDA HURD
Defendant:
BURNHAM CORPORATION, CARRIER CORPORATION, CLEAVER BROOKS INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Preston v. A.W. Chesterton, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00280
Plaintiff:
David Preston
Defendant:
A.W. Chesterton, Inc. , American Standard Inc. , Bayer Cropscience, Inc. and others
Cross_claimant:
General Electric Company , Greene, Tweed & Co., Inc. , Elliott Company and others
Cross_defendant:
General Electric Company , A.W. Chesterton, Inc. , Air & Liquid Systems Corporation and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
Utica Boilers
Thirdparty_defendant:
A.W. Chesterton, Inc. , Air & Liquid Systems Corporation , American Standard Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Akers v. A.W. Chesterton Company et al
as 1:2011cv00281
Plaintiff:
Nancy R. Akers
Defendant:
A.W. Chesterton Company, Aesys Technologies LLC, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation and others
Cross_claimant:
Air & Liquid Systems Corporation , Crane Co. , Oakfabco, Inc. and others
Cross_defendant:
A.W. Chesterton Company, Aesys Technologies LLC, Alfa Laval, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
St. Laurent v. A.W. Chesterton, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00279
Plaintiff:
Rachel St. Laurent
Defendant:
A.W. Chesterton, Inc., Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Allied Signal, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Knowles et al v. A.W. Chesterton Company et al
as 1:2010cv00499
Plaintiff:
Wilford Knowles and Laura Knowles
Defendant:
A.W. Chesterton Company, Bayer Cropscience, Inc., BW/IP International Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Asbestos Litigation
Nelson v. A. W. Chesterton Company et al
as 1:2010cv00065
Plaintiff:
William T. Nelson, William T. Nelson, William T. Nelson and others
Defendant:
A. W. Chesterton Company, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Alco Valves (US), Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Asbestos Litigation
HOGAN-WHEELER v. ECKEL INDUSTRIES INC et al
as 1:2009cv00367
Plaintiff:
GLORIA HOGAN-WHEELER
Defendant:
ECKEL INDUSTRIES INC, GENERAL INSULATION COMPANY , P S THORSEN COMPANY OF MASSACHUSETTS and others
Thirdparty_defendant:
MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
OWENS-ILLINOIS INC
Cross_claimant:
BUFFALO PUMPS INC , CRANE CO and RAPID-AMERICAN CORPORATION
Cross_defendant:
OWENS-ILLINOIS INC, OWENS-ILLINOIS GLASS COMPANY, RAPID-AMERICAN CORPORATION and others
Counter_claimant:
RAPID-AMERICAN CORPORATION
Counter_defendant:
CBS CORPORATION , ALFA LAVAL INC, ROPER INDUSTRIES INC and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
RICHELLI v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 1:2009cv00101
Plaintiff:
MARSHA J RICHELLI
Defendant:
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY , EASTERN REFRACTORIES COMPANY INC, ECKEL INDUSTRIES INC and others
Cross_claimant:
AURORA PUMP COMPANY , ELLIOT TURBO MACHINERY CO INC , IMO INDUSTRIES INC and others
Cross_defendant:
MARMON WIRE & CABLE LLC, UNIROYAL INC, API HEAT TRANSFER INC and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Taylor, et al v. Airco, Inc., et al
as 07-2422
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JUNE A. TAYLOR, RUSSELL H. TAYLOR, DUSTIN H. TAYLOR and others
Defendant:
AIRCO, INC., AIR PRODUCTS & CHEMICALS INC., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., BRIDGESTONE/FIRESTONE, INC. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
AMERICAN CHEMISTRY COUNCIL, American Chemistry Council, f/k/a Chemical Manufacturi Chemical Manufacturing Association and the Manufacturing Chemists Association, BORDEN INC, CONOCOPHILLIPS and others
Taylor, et al v. Airco, Inc., et al
as 3:2002cv30014
Defendant:
The American Chemistry Council, Goodrich Corporation, Honeywell International, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
June A. Taylor, Russell H. Taylor, Dustin H. Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
