Cases 11 - 20 of 50
WATERMAN v. PAUL G WHITE INTERIOR SOLUTIONS
as 2:2019cv00032
Defendant:
PAUL G WHITE INTERIOR SOLUTIONS
Plaintiff:
JAKE GEYER WATERMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
WHITE v. HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY et al
as 2:2017cv00491
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW J WHITE
Defendant:
HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY , HP INC and HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ESTATE OF DONALD GRENIER v. MAYHEW et al
as 1:2017cv00364
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF DONALD GRENIER
Defendant:
MARY MAYHEW, CARLTON LEWIS, DAVID WHITE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
HUTCHINS v. SKOWHEGAN SAVING BANK et al
as 1:2016cv00280
Plaintiff:
BONNY LOU BUZZELL HUTCHINS
Defendant:
SKOWHEGAN SAVING BANK, ADAM & EVE HAIRCARE, COMMUNITY CRISIS COUNSELING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WHITING v. BLUE SCHOOL INC et al
as 1:2016cv00200
Plaintiff:
THERESA WHITING
Defendant:
BLUE SCHOOL INC and KENNETH S PALMER
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
SEVIGNY et al v. CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY et al
as 1:2016cv00123
Plaintiff:
MARIO SEVIGNY , MARC-ANTOINE SEVIGNY and LOUISE BRETON
Defendant:
CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY , DEVLAR ENERGY MARKETING LLC , LARIO OIL AND GAS COMPANY and others
Movant:
ROBERT J KEACH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mercier v. Canadian Pacific Railway Company, et al
as 1:2016cv00152
Plaintiff:
CHRISTIANE MERCIER
Defendant:
CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY , RAIL WORLD INC, RAIL WORLD HOLDINGS LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
WHITE et al v. WHITE
as 2:2016cv00085
Plaintiff:
DENISE P WHITE and DIANE W THOMASINO
Defendant:
STEPHEN F WHITE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SWISH WHITE RIVER LTD v. BERNARD et al
as 2:2016cv00078
Plaintiff:
SWISH WHITE RIVER LTD
Defendant:
MICHAEL BERNARD and CHAD LEONARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. ADAM WHITE
as 2:2016cv00041
Movant:
USA
Respondent:
ADAM WHITE
Cause Of Action: Contempt Proceedings
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
