Cases 21 - 30 of 69
Booth Family Trust v. EMC Corporation et al
as 1:2016cv10114
Plaintiff:
Booth Family Trust
Defendant:
EMC Corporation, Jose E. Almeida, Michael W. Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Pancake v. EMC Corporation et al
as 1:2016cv10040
Plaintiff:
Jerry Pancake
Defendant:
EMC Corporation, Joseph M. Tucci, Jose E. Almeida and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Stull v. EMC Corporation et al
as 1:2015cv13692
Plaintiff:
Philip Stull
Defendant:
EMC Corporation , Dell Inc., Silver Lake Partners, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Walsh v. EMC Corporation et al
as 1:2015cv13654
Plaintiff:
Thomas Walsh
Defendant:
EMC Corporation , Jose E. Almeida , Michael W. Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Feng v. Burke, Dennehy & Company, P.C. et al
as 1:2015cv13170
Plaintiff:
Kristi Feng
Defendant:
Burke, Dennehy & Company, P.C. , James L. Burke , James L Burke, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Shannon v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2015cv12895
Plaintiff:
Edmund Shannon
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv10082
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kinan v. Starbucks Coffee Puerto Rico, LLC et al
as 3:2014cv01916
Plaintiff:
Edmund Kinan
Defendant:
Starbucks Coffee Puerto Rico, LLC, Hilton CP Management, LLC and Hilton CP Operator, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In re: JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.
as 14-8015
Petitioner:
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Interested Party:
US OFFICE OF THE COMPTROLLER OF THE CURRENCY
Respondent:
GEOFFREY A. HOLLIS, SHARON R. HOLLIS, EDMUND MANSOR and others
In re: JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.
as 14-8011
Respondent:
GEOFFREY A. HOLLIS, SHARON R. HOLLIS, EDMUND MANSOR and others
Petitioner:
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Interested Party:
US OFFICE OF THE COMPTROLLER OF THE CURRENCY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
