Cases 21 - 30 of 17,822
Ardon Salvajan v. USCIS et al
as 1:2024cv11268
Plaintiff:
Wilfrido N Ardon Salvajan
Defendant:
U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES (USCIS), Asylum Office, USCIS, Director of USCIS Ur Mendoza Jaddou and others
Other:
United States
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Hernandez-Graulau et al v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv01214
Plaintiff:
Nelson Hernandez-Graulau and Ana M Graulau-Collazo
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. 414 EAST KENNEBEC ROAD, MACHIAS, MAINE
as 1:2024cv00168
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
414 EAST KENNEBEC ROAD, MACHIAS, MAINE
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property - Real Estate
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. 368 WEST RIDGE ROAD, CORNVILLE, MAINE
as 1:2024cv00166
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
368 WEST RIDGE ROAD, CORNVILLE, MAINE
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property - Real Estate
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. 9 ST ALBANS ROAD, CORINNA, MAINE
as 1:2024cv00165
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
9 ST ALBANS ROAD, CORINNA, MAINE
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property - Real Estate
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. 590 HANSON ROAD, CHINA, MAINE
as 1:2024cv00167
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
590 HANSON ROAD, CHINA, MAINE
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property - Real Estate
MFRP Corporation v. United States Small Business Administration
as 1:2024cv11245
Plaintiff:
MFRP Corporation doing business as Squire Night Club also known as Squire Lounge and Squire Lounge
Defendant:
United States Small Business Administration, Isabella Casillas Guzman, Janet Yellen and others
US v. Pontz
as 24-1438
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
KENNETH PONTZ
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
