Cases 31 - 40 of 369
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv01532
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv01358
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623
Perez-Marquez v. Departamento de Justicia de Puerto Rico
as 3:2021cv01343
Plaintiff:
William Perez-Marquez
Defendant:
Departamento de Justicia de Puerto Rico and Department of Justice of Puerto Rico
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Diaz-Rodriguez v. USA
as 3:2021cv01316
Petitioner:
William J. Diaz-Rodriguez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv01298
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
DO NOT DOCKET IN THIS MEMBER CASE- LEAD CASE IS NOW CIVIL NO. 21-1004(GAG)
as 3:2021cv01144
Plaintiff:
Juanita Kay Vogel, Casa La Roca, LLC and Charles Henry Eugene Vogel
Defendant:
William Rivera Molina, Ebano 155, Inc., Poppy 47, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Colon-Rosado v. Roman-Lopez et al
as 3:2021cv01141
Plaintiff:
Gerardo Colon-Rosado
Defendant:
Administracion de Correccion y Rehabilitacion, Jose Roman-Lopez, Eduardo Carire and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv01130
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Sanchez-Rosario v. The United States of America et al
as 3:2021cv01110
Defendant:
Alfonso S. Martinez-Piovanetti, US Congress, The Batista Law Group, PSC and others
Plaintiff:
David Sanchez-Rosario
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1471
Mende et al v. Fun Brothers Hut LLC et al
as 3:2021cv01108
Defendant:
Insurance Company B, John Doe, Jane Roe and others
Plaintiff:
William Mende and Keila Lopez- De Jesus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
