Cases 31 - 40 of 5,196
TAN et al v. LO et al
as 1:2024cv00145
Plaintiff:
CHI HUI TAN and KUNG TUAN TAN
Defendant:
VICTOR K S LO and EVER SPRING CO INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
US v. Joseph-Deceus
as 24-1402
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
HANS MARIO JOSEPH-DECEUS, a/k/a Negro
Owl Feather-Gorbey v. District of Columbia, et al
as 24-1401
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL S. OWL FEATHER-GORBEY, a/k/a Michael S. Gorbey, a/k/a Tsunami Khan
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, D.C. CIRCUIT FEDERAL COURTS, 2ND CIRCUIT FEDERAL COURTS and others
US v. Morales-Hernandez
as 24-1398
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
ANGEL L. MORALES-HERNANDEZ, a/k/a Angel, a/k/a Chinese Checker
Naicom Corporation, et al v. Dish Network Corporation, et al
as 24-1416
Plaintiff:
NAICOM CORPORATION, D&V IP HOLDINGS, LLC, PAYLINK, LLC and others
Defendant:
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION, DISH NETWORK L.L.C., NAGRASTAR L.L.C. and others
US v. Resto-Figueroa
as 24-1362
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
JOSE D. RESTO-FIGUEROA, a/k/a Tego
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01144
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv11051
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Verizon Sickness & Acc Dis Benf Pln for NE Assoc v. Rogers, et al
as 24-1198
Plaintiff:
VERIZON SICKNESS AND ACCIDENT DISABILITY BENEFIT PLAN FOR NEW ENGLAND ASSOCIATES
Defendant:
JACQUELINE ROGERS and AFFILIATED LAW OFFICES OF RICHARD M. SANDS, INC., a/k/a Sands Law Offices
Cross Defendant:
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC. and EQUIAN, LLC
Church v. United States of America et al
as 1:2024cv10470
Plaintiff:
Corrin Church
Defendant:
United States of America, J Doe, K Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
