Cases 31 - 40 of 95
Panaggio v. Sawin et al
as 1:2018cv00083
Plaintiff:
Andrew Panaggio
Defendant:
Rhonda Sawin and Paul Murphy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Panaggio v. Sawin et al
as 1:2018cv00082
Plaintiff:
Andrew Panaggio
Defendant:
Rhonda Sawin and Paul Murphy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ovist v. UNUM Life Insurance Company of America et al
as 4:2017cv40113
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Ovist
Defendant:
UNUM Life Insurance Company of America and Unum Group
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
MCLAIN v. WAL-MART STORES EAST LP
as 2:2017cv00222
Plaintiff:
RHONDA MCLAIN
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
The Dial Corporation v. Carter, et al
as 17-8009
Respondent:
MICHELLE CARTER, JONATHAN CESSNA, ALICIA GENTILE and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL FEUER, MARTIN HOMMEL, KAMI RALEIGH and others
Petitioner:
DIAL CORP.
Defendant:
HENKEL CONSUMER GOODS, INC.
Interested Party:
RHONDA D. JONES
The Dial Corporation v. Carter, et al
as 17-8009
Plaintiff - Respondent:
MICHELLE CARTER, JONATHAN CESSNA, ALICIA GENTILE and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL FEUER, MARTIN HOMMEL, KAMI RALEIGH and others
Defendant - Petitioner:
DIAL CORP.
Defendant:
HENKEL CONSUMER GOODS, INC.
Interested Party:
RHONDA D. JONES
Mark Burgess et al v. HP Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv10207
Plaintiff:
Mark Burgess , Rhonda Johnson , Larry Lopez and others
Defendant:
HP Inc. , Fidelity Management Trust Company , Fidelity Investments Institutional Operations Company and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Lewis v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC
as 1:2016cv11800
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Lewis
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rosano v. TPG Hospitality, Inc.
as 1:2015cv13645
Defendant:
TPG Hospitality, Inc
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Rosano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Costa v. Colvin
as 1:2015cv11687
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Costa
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
