Cases 31 - 40 of 97
Reade v. Galvin
as 1:2021cv10064
Defendant:
Francis Galvin
Plaintiff:
William F Reade, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Rotger v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC et al
as 3:2020cv01653
Defendant:
Hi-Tech Pharmacal Co., Inc., Apotex Corportion, McKesson Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Awilda Rotger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Marcano v. GlaxoSmithKline et al
as 3:2020cv01515
Defendant:
Hi-Tech, Teva, Dr. Reddys and others
Plaintiff:
Gladys Marcano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Reade, Jr. v. Casper et al
as 1:2020cv11324
Defendant:
Allison Dale Burroughs, Denise J. Casper, O. Rogeriee Thompson and others
Plaintiff:
William F. Reade, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
59 Middlesex Ave, LLC v. Town of Reading
as 1:2020cv11101
Defendant:
Town of Reading
Plaintiff:
59 Middlesex Ave, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Reade v. Pelosi et al
as 1:2020cv11039
Defendant:
Barack Hussien Obama, Nancy Pelosi and William Francis Galvin
Plaintiff:
William F Reade, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
New England Acupuncture & Oriental Herbal Services, Inc. v. American Casualty Company of Reading, Pennsylvania
as 4:2020cv40013
Defendant:
American Casualty Company of Reading, Pennsylvania
Plaintiff:
New England Acupuncture & Oriental Herbal Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Reade et al v. HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORP.
as 1:2020cv10088
Plaintiff:
Thomas Reade and Nancy Reade
Defendant:
HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kosta v. Masachusetts State Police
as 1:2019cv10605
Defendant:
Famingham Police, Revere Police Department, Kristen Bourdeau and others
Plaintiff:
Demetri Kosta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Reade v. Gants et al
as 1:2018cv12514
Defendant:
Judge Robert C. Rufo, Barbara A. Lenk, Assistant Clerk John Dale and others
Plaintiff:
William F Reade, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
