Cases 31 - 40 of 40
Ornament Central, LLC v. Rudolph and Me, Inc. et al
as 4:2011cv40011
Plaintiff:
Ornament Central, LLC
Defendant:
Rudolph and Me, Inc. , Roeb-ken's Rascals, Family Trees Unlimited, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv10774
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
United States of America v. Miller
as 1:2008mc10189
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
Rudolph F. Miller
United States of America v. Miller
as 1:2008mc10188
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
Rudolph F. Miller
Securities, et al v. Adley
as 08-1347
Plaintiff - Appellee:
US SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant:
CHANCELLOR CORPORATION, FRANKLYN CHURCHILL, DAVID VOLPE and others
Defendant - Appellant:
BRIAN ADLEY
:
Copelan et al v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
as 3:2008cv01233
Plaintiff:
Raymond Copelan, Shirley Rudolph, Vickie Futch and others
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic Puerto Rico, Inc. and Medtronic Puerto Rico Operations Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hubbard v. Ledezma, et al
as 08-1141
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RUDOLPH HUBBARD
Defendant - Appellee:
HECTOR LEDEZMA, JOSE L. RODRIGUEZ, MICHAEL SMITH and others
Riches v. Giuliani et al
as 1:2007cv12013
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
Rudolph W. Giuliani and Mitt Romney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hubbard v. United States of America
as 3:2007cv01927
Plaintiff:
Rudolph Hubbard
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hikel v. Islanet Communications, Inc. et al
as 3:2007cv01905
Plaintiff:
Rudolph D. Hikel
Defendant:
Islanet Communications, Inc. and Ialanet, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
