Cases filed in the First Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 79
Estate of Robert Cunningham v. Millennium Laboratories of Cal
as 14-1911
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES, ex rel Robert Cunningham, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ex rel, STATE OF CONNECTICUT, ex rel and others
Plaintiff - Appellant: ESTATE OF ROBERT CUNNINGHAM
Defendant - Appellee: MILLENNIUM LABORATORIES OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
In Re: Cegelski
as 14-8016
Respondent: FRANK BALAKER CEGELSKI
: MASSACHUSETTS SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT and SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
United States of America et al v. Cyberonics, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv10214
Plaintiff: United States of America , State of California, State of Colorado and others
Defendant: Cyberonics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
US ex. rel. Ge v. Takeda Pharmaceutical Company, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-1089
Plaintiff - Appellant: HELEN GE
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, STATE OF DELAWARE and others
Defendant - Appellee: TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY LIMITED and TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICA NORTH AMERICA, INC.
US ex. rel. Ge v. Takeda Pharmaceutical Company, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-1088
Plaintiff - Appellant: HELEN GE
Plaintiff: STATE OF CALIFORNIA, STATE OF DELAWARE, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Defendant - Appellee: TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY LIMITED and TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICA NORTH AMERICA, INC.
US, et al v. Guidant Corporation, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-1867
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES, ex rel. Heidi Heineman-Guta, STATE OF ARKANSAS, ex rel. Heidi Heineman-Guta, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ex rel. Heidi Heineman-Guta and others
Plaintiff - Appellant: HEIDI HEINEMAN-GUTA, Relator
Defendant - Appellee: GUIDANT CORPORATION and BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION, Individually and as Successor-in-Interest to Guidant Corporation
United States of America v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv10896
Plaintiff: United States of America , State of Arkansas, State of California and others
Defendant: DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , Depuy, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
US, et al v. Ahold, et al
as 12-1474
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES, ex rel David R. Ciaschini, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, ex rel David R. Ciaschini, STATE OF NEW YORK, ex rel David R. Ciaschini and others
Plaintiff - Appellant: DAVID R. CIASCHINI, Relator
Defendant: ROYAL AHOLD, a/k/a N.V. KoninKlijke Ahold and STOP & SHOP/GIANT-LANDOVER
Defendant - Appellee: AHOLD U.S.A., INC., STOP & SHOP CO., GIANT FOOD, LLC. and others
United States of America et al v. Biogen Idec Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv10601
Plaintiff: United States of America , Michael Bawduniak , State of California and others
Defendant: Biogen Idec Inc.
Consolidated_plaintiff: RTR Group, LLP , State of Connecticut, State of Washington and others
Consolidated_defendant: Elan Corporation, PLC and Elan Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
In Re: Pharmaceutical Industry
as 12-1067
Plaintiff - Appellee: SHIRLEY GELLER, ACTION ALLIANCE OF SENIOR CITIZENS OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA, TWIN CITIES BAKERY WORKERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND and others
: COUNTY OF ORANGE, ESSEX SUPERIOR COURT JUDGE, M. JOYCE HOWE and others
Plaintiff: STATE OF VA, LARRY YOUNG and THERESE SHEPLEY
Movant - Appellant: CORINNA CONNICK
Defendant - Appellee: BAXTER PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS, INC., STANLEY C. HOPKINS, MONSANTO COMPANY and others
Defendant: AGOURON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., BIOGEN, INC., GLAXOSMITHKLINE, PLC and others
Interested Party - Appellee: COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH CARE POLICY AND FINANCING, HUMANA, INC., CARDINAL HEALTH, INC. and others
Interested Party: MILBERG LLP, PARMED PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., MUTUAL OF OMAHA INSURANCE COMPANY and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?