Cases filed in the First Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 88
In Re: Pharmaceutical Industry
as 10-1959
: SHIRLEY GELLER, UNITED FOOD & COMMERCIAL WORKERS UNIONS AND EMPLOYERS MIDEST HEALTH BENEFITS FUND, ACTION ALLIANCE OF SENIOR CITIZENS OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA and others
Plaintiff - Appellee: PIPEFITTERS LOCAL 537 TRUST FUNDS, BLUE CROSS/BLUE SHIELD OF MASSACHUSETTS and SHEET METAL WORKERS UNION NATIONAL HEALTH FUND
Defendant - Appellant: BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY
Defendant - Appellee: GLAXOWELLCOME, INC.
Appellant: DONALD E. HAVILAND, JR.
De Jesus-Rivera v. Abbott Laboratories et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2010cv01144
Plaintiff: Gloria B. De Jesus-Rivera
Defendant: Abbott Laboratories and Abbott Laboratories PR Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Type: Labor Labor: Other
Bertrand et al v. Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals LP et al
as 4:2010cv40039
Defendant: Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals LP and others
Plaintiff: Michelle Bertrand and James Bertrand
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
The State of Mississippi v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv12058
Plaintiff: The State of Mississippi, The State of Mississippi, The State of Mississippi and others
Defendant: Abbott Laboratories, Inc., Abbott Laboratories, Inc., Abbott Laboratories, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Colon-Jimenez et al v. Advanced Medical Optics, Inc.
as 3:2009cv02172
Plaintiff: Francisco Colon-Jimenez, Xioana Nieves, conjugal partnership Colon-Nieves and others
Defendant: Advanced Medical Optics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Type: Torts - Injury Both
Rohn, et al v. TAP Pharmaceutical Products, I, et al
as 09-1887
Plaintiff - Appellee: MILTON GREENE, WILLIAM M. PORTER, LIBERTY NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Plaintiff - Appellant: DENNIS ROHN, BARBARA SENSING and VALERIE SAMSELL
Interested Party - Appellee: STATE OF IDAHO, STATE OF ILLINOIS, STATE OF KENTUCKY and others
Defendant - Appellee: TAP PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS, INC., ABBOTT LABORATORIES and TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY, LIMITED
Interested Party: SOUTHEASTERN UROLOGICAL CENTER, P.A., KLINE & SPECTER GROUP and KLINE & SPECTER, PC
Type: Other Statutes RICO
Flores-Garcia v. Abbott Laboratories et al
as 3:2009cv01541
Plaintiff: Maritza Flores-Garcia
Defendant: Abbott Laboratories and Abbott Laboratories Puerto Rico, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Type: Labor Plaintiff
Landrau-Sanchez v. Abbott Laboratories et al
as 3:2009cv01540
Plaintiff: Muguet Landrau-Sanchez
Defendant: Abbott Laboratories and Abbott Laboratories Puerto Rico, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Type: Labor Plaintiff
In Re: Pharmaceutical Case, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-1196
: SHIRLEY GELLER, ACTION ALLIANCE OF SENIOR CITIZENS OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA, TWIN CITIES BAKERY WORKERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND and others
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED FOOD & COMMERCIAL WORKERS UNIONS AND EMPLOYERS MIDEST HEALTH BENEFITS FUND, CARPENTERS & MILLWRI, Carpenters & Millwrights of Houston and Vicinity Welfare Trust Fund, Board of Trustees, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, LEROY TOWNSEND, Individually and on behalf of other similarly situated and others
: UNITED STATES, COUNTY OF ULSTER, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA and others
Plaintiff - Appellant: M. JOYCE HOWE
Defendant - Appellant: BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY
Defendant - Appellee: GLAXOWELLCOME, INC. and ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP
Bayer Healthcare, LLC, v. Abbott Laboratories et al
as 4:2009cv40061
Plaintiff: Bayer Healthcare, LLC,, Bayer Healthcare, LLC,, Bayer Healthcare, LLC, and others
Defendant: Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Laboratories and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?