Cases 41 - 50 of 140
Schofield v. Clarke, et al
as 11-1470
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EUGENE SCHOFIELD
Defendant - Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Commissioner, CAROL MICI, Director of Classification, PAUL F. OXFORD, Acting Chief, Investigative Services and others
Cullinan v. Mental Health Management Correctional Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv10593
Plaintiff:
John P. Cullinan
Defendant:
Mental Health Management Correctional Services, Inc., George Johns, Nancy Dizio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shedlock v. MA Department of Correction, et al
as 11-1324
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAUL F. SHEDLOCK
Defendant - Appellee:
MA DEPT OF CORRECTION, HAROLD W. CLARKE, Commissioner, MICHAEL CORSINI and others
Lyons v. Dubois, et al
as 11-1313
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS J. LYONS
Defendant - Appellee:
MARC DUBOIS and HAROLD W. CLARKE
Seward v. Corsini et al
as 1:2011cv10445
Plaintiff:
Carlin Seward , II
Defendant:
Michael Corsini and Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morales v. Clarke
as 11-1071
Petitioner - Appellant:
PORFORIO MORALES
Respondent - Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE
Colon v. Fillis et al
as 4:2011cv40019
Plaintiff:
Celestino Colon
Defendant:
Charles Fillis, Thomas Ficco, Richard Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cryer v. MA Department of Corrections, et al
as 11-1009
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEREK SINCERE CRYER DEREK SINCERE BLACK WOLF CRYER
Defendant - Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, HAROLD W. CLARKE, CHRISTOPHER MITCHELL and others
Defendant:
JAMES R. BENDER and RONALD T. DUVAL
In re: Hudman v. Clarke
as 10-2460
Petitioner:
In re: MELVIN HUDMAN
Respondent:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Commissioner of Corrections, ROBERT MURPHY, Superintendent, Massachusetts Treatment Center and JUSTIN W. PRARIO, Institutional Grievance Coordinator, Massachusetts Treatment Center
LeBaron v. Clarke et al
as 1:2010cv12085
Plaintiff:
Nathan Marquis LeBaron
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, Sherry Elliott, Bill Bates and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
