Cases 41 - 50 of 5,200
US v. Resto-Figueroa
as 24-1362
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
JOSE D. RESTO-FIGUEROA, a/k/a Tego
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01144
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Verizon Sickness & Acc Dis Benf Pln for NE Assoc v. Rogers, et al
as 24-1198
Plaintiff:
VERIZON SICKNESS AND ACCIDENT DISABILITY BENEFIT PLAN FOR NEW ENGLAND ASSOCIATES
Defendant:
JACQUELINE ROGERS and AFFILIATED LAW OFFICES OF RICHARD M. SANDS, INC., a/k/a Sands Law Offices
Cross Defendant:
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC. and EQUIAN, LLC
In Re: Santiago-Lugo
as 24-1373
Petitioner:
ISRAEL SANTIAGO-LUGO, a/k/a El Doctor
Respondent:
UNITED STATES
Interested Party:
JOSE ANIBAL CABRANES, TEXACO PUERTO RICO, INC., BANCO POPULAR DE PUERTO RICO, as claimant of One Urban Lot #72, located at Ibiza St., Paseo Las Brisas, RP. and others
Church v. United States of America et al
as 1:2024cv10470
Plaintiff:
Corrin Church
Defendant:
United States of America, J Doe, K Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Wells v. Pierce et al
as 1:2024fp00100
Plaintiff:
Brian K. Wells
Defendant:
Merrill Lynch Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc., BOFA Securities, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010 Petition to Vacate Arbitration Award
US v. Lugo-Montalvo
as 24-1344
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
ALAN LUGO-MONTALVO, a/k/a Allan Lugo-Montalvo
Interested Party:
EMMA M. GREENWOOD, OSCAR JOSE SERRANO NEGRON and KEHYLIS YOLANDA VAZQUEZ-TORRES
T v. O'Malley, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 1:2024cv10875
Plaintiff:
K T
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
US v. Yu
as 24-1325
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
HAOYANG YU, a/k/a Jack Yu, a/k/a Harry Yu, a/k/a Jack Tricon
Interested Party:
ANALOG DEVICES, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
