Cases 41 - 48 of 48
MJ Promotions, Inc. et al v. RBS Citizens, N.A.
as 3:2009cv30233
Plaintiff:
MJ Promotions, Inc., MI Great Ideas, Inc. and Select Marketing and Distribution, Inc.
Defendant:
RBS Citizens, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Contract Dispute
Alongi et al v. John's Gradall Service et al
as 1:2009cv11915
Plaintiff:
Gina M. Alongi, International Union of Operating Engineers Local 4 Health and Welfare, Pension, Annuity and Savings Funds, Labor-Management Cooperation Trust and Hoisting and Portable Engineers Local 4 Apprentice and Training Fund
Defendant:
John's Gradall Service and Laura Mailhot
Trustee:
RBS Citizens, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Provenir, Inc. v. RBS Citizens, N.A.
as 1:2009cv00436
Plaintiff:
Provenir, Inc.
Defendant:
RBS Citizens, N.A., RBS Citizens, N.A., RBS Citizens, N.A. and others
Counter Claimant:
RBS Citizens, N.A. and RBS Citizens, N.A.
Counter Defendant:
Provenir, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Hunt v. RBS Citizens, N.A. et al
as 1:2009cv00377
Plaintiff:
Gary Hunt
Defendant:
RBS Citizens, N.A., Citizens Bank of Pennsylvania and Citizens Financial Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Cedrez v. RBS Citizens, N.A.
as 3:2009cv30081
Plaintiff:
Wilfredo Cedrez
Defendant:
RBS Citizens, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00390
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
American National Insurance Company v. RBS Citizens, N.A. et al
as 1:2008mc00070
Plaintiff:
American National Insurance Company
Defendant:
RBS Citizens, N.A. and Citizens Automobile Finance, Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv11075
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
