Cases filed in the First Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 61
United States of America et al v. Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv11043
Plaintiff: United States of America , State of California , State of Delaware and others
Defendant: Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited and Takeda Pharmaceuticals North America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
USA et al v. Guidant Corporation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv11927
Plaintiff: USA , State of Arkansas , State of California and others
Defendant: Guidant Corporation and Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Rohn, et al v. TAP Pharmaceutical Products, I, et al
as 09-1887
Plaintiff - Appellee: MILTON GREENE, WILLIAM M. PORTER, LIBERTY NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Plaintiff - Appellant: DENNIS ROHN, BARBARA SENSING and VALERIE SAMSELL
Interested Party - Appellee: STATE OF IDAHO, STATE OF ILLINOIS, STATE OF KENTUCKY and others
Defendant - Appellee: TAP PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS, INC., ABBOTT LABORATORIES and TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY, LIMITED
Interested Party: SOUTHEASTERN UROLOGICAL CENTER, P.A., KLINE & SPECTER GROUP and KLINE & SPECTER, PC
Type: Other Statutes RICO
In Re: Pharmaceutical Case, et al
as 09-1196
Not Classified By Court: PURDUE PHARMA COMPANY, PARMED PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., BEN VENUE LABORATORIES INC. and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: KENNETH VANDERWAL, VERMONT PUBLIC INTEREST RESEARCH GROUP, LEROY TOWNSEND, Individually and on behalf of other similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellant: BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY
Plaintiff / Appellant: M. JOYCE HOWE
Defendant / Appellee: ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICAL LP and GLAXOWELLCOME, INC.
United States of America ex. rel. et al v. Infomedics, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2008cv11775
Plaintiff: United States of America ex. rel. , State of California, State of Delaware and others
Defendant: Infomedics, Inc. , Glaxosmithkline, PLC and Glaxosmithkline, LLC
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
In Re: Pharmaceutical
as 08-1190
Not Classified By Court: SHIRLEY GELLER, UNITED FOOD & COMMERCIAL WORKERS UNIONS AND EMPLOYERS MIDWEST HEALTH BENEFITS FUND, ACTION ALLIANCE OF SENIOR CITIZENS OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: HAROLD BEAN, LARRY YOUNG, THERESE SHEPLEY and others
United States of American, et al v. Medtronic, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2008cv10368
Plaintiff: United States of America , Tricia Nowak , State of California and others
Defendant: Medtronic, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
In Re: Pharmaceutica, et al, et al
as 08-8001
Not Classified By Court: SHIRLEY GELLER, UNITED FOOD & COMMERCIAL WORKERS UNIONS AND EMPLOYERS MIDWEST HEALTH BENEFITS FUND, ACTION ALLIANCE OF SENIOR CITIZENS OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA and others
Petitioner: DONALD E. HAVILAND, JR., LARRY YOUNG, THERESE SHEPLEY and others
Respondent: BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, JOHNSON & JOHNSON INTERNATIONAL, APOTHECON, INC. and others
Defendant / Appellee: GLAXOSMITHKLINE and GLAXOWELLCOME, INC.
Young, et al v. Bristol Myers Squibb Bristol-M, et al
as 08-1002
Not Classified By Court: SHIRLEY GELLER, UNITED FOOD & COMMERCIAL WORKERS UNIONS AND EMPLOYERS MIDWEST HEALTH BENEFITS FUND, ACTION ALLIANCE OF SENIOR CITIZENS OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: THERESE SHEPLEY and LARRY YOUNG
Defendant / Appellee: BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, WARRICK PHARMACEUTICALS CORPORATION, ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICAL LP and others
In Re: Pharmaceutical, et al
as 08-1056
Not Classified By Court: SHIRLEY GELLER, UNITED FOOD & COMMERCIAL WORKERS UNIONS AND EMPLOYERS MIDWEST HEALTH BENEFITS FUND, ACTION ALLIANCE OF SENIOR CITIZENS OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: PIPEFITTERS LOCAL 537 TRUST FUNDS and SHEET METAL WORKERS UNION NATIONAL HEALTH FUND
Defendant / Appellee: BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF MASSACHUSETTS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?