Cases 51 - 60 of 890
Bain v. Divris
as 23-1850
Petitioner / Appellant:
BENZY BAIN
Respondent / Appellee:
MATTHEW DIVRIS, Superintendent, M.C.I. - Norfolk and MATTHEW DIVRIS, Superintendent, North Central Correctional Institution
Duarte v. Department of Justice et al
as 1:2023cv12388
Plaintiff:
Eric J. Duarte
Defendant:
Department of Justice, Sheriff Patrick W. McDermott, Superintendent Danielle Frane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Duarte v. Bridgewater State Hospital et al
as 1:2023cv12288
Plaintiff:
Eric J. Duarte
Defendant:
Bridgewater State Hospital, Wellpath Medical, LLC Department of Correction, Commissioner of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1818
Petitioner / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Henderson v. Kelly
as 23-1777
Petitioner / Appellant:
FREDERICK HENDERSON
Respondent / Appellee:
SHEILA KELLY, Superintendent, MCI Concord
Vasbinder v. Superintendent Streeter
as 3:2023cv30096
Petitioner:
William James Vasbinder
Respondent:
Superintendent Streeter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Rivera v. Kelly
as 1:2023cv12046
Petitioner:
Heriberto Rivera
Respondent:
Superintendent Sheila Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1704
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Rodriguez v. Divris
as 4:2023cv40107
Petitioner:
Eduardo Rodriguez
Respondent:
Superintendent Matthew Divris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mahdi v. Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2023cv11905
Petitioner:
Abdul Jaleel Mahdi
Respondent:
Department of Corrections, Commissioner of Correction, MCI Norfolk and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
