Cases 61 - 70 of 132
Forte v. Commissioner of Corrections
as 4:2014cv40173
Petitioner:
Michael Forte
Respondent:
Commissioner of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Loestrin 24 FE Antitrust Liti, et al, et al
as 14-2071
Plaintiff:
PROVIDENCE, RI, individually and on behalf of itself andall others similarly situated, UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS LOCAL 1776 & PARTICIPATING EMPLOYERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, NEW YORK HOTEL TRADES COUNCIL AND HOTEL ASSOC. OF NEW YORK CITY, INC. HEALTH BENEFITS FUND, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AMERICAN SALES COMPANY, LLC, ROCHESTER DRUG CO-OPERATIVE, INC., on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated and DIRECT PURCHASER CLASS PLAINTIFFS
Defendant - Appellee:
WARNER CHILCOTT COMPANY, LLC, WARNER CHILCOTT PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY, WARNER CHILCOTT HOLDINGS COMPANY, III, LTD. and others
Gustavson et al v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
as 1:2014cv13690
Plaintiff:
Shirley Gustavson and Arvid Gustavson
Defendant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company , Foster Wheeler Energy Corp , Eastern Refractories Company, Inc. and others
Cross_claimant:
Foster Wheeler Energy Corp , General Electric Company , Nibco, Inc. and others
Cross_defendant:
All Defendants, General Electric Company , Nibco, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
NLRB v. Le Fort Enterprises, Inc.
as 14-1917
Petitioner:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Respondent:
LE FORT ENTERPRISES, INC., d/b/a Merry Maids of Boston
Cherry Hills Apartments of Fort Worth, LLC et al v. Engleby
as 1:2014cv12953
Plaintiff:
Cherry Hills Apartments of Fort Worth, LLC , Michael Farragher , Sheila Farragher-Gemma and others
Defendant:
Robert Engleby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cherry Hills Apartments of Forth Worth, LLC et al v. Engleby
as 1:2014cv12954
Plaintiff:
Cherry Hills Apartments of Fort Worth, LLC , Michael Farragher , Sheila Farragher-Gemma and others
Defendant:
Robert Engleby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE, FORT LAUDERDALE LODGE 31, INSURANCE TRUST FUND v. MEDICIS PHARMACEUTICAL CORP. et al
as 1:2014cv10440
Plaintiff:
FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE, FORT LAUDERDALE LODGE 31, INSURANCE TRUST FUND
Defendant:
Medicis Pharmaceutical Corp., Impax Laboratories, Inc., Lupin Limited and others
Movant:
UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS LOCAL 1776 & PARTICIPATING EMPLOYERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
In re Solodyn (Minocycline Hydrochloride) Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2014md02503
Plaintiff:
Sheet Metal Workers Local No. 25 Health & Welfare Fund, United Food and Commercial Workers Local 1776 & Participating Employers Health and Welfare Fund, Fraternal Order of Police, Fort Lauderdale Lodge 31 and others
Not Classified By Court:
National Medical Health Card Systems, Inc., California Physicians' Service d/b/a Blue Shield of California, United HealthCare Services, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Barr Laboratories, Inc., Matrix Laboratories Ltd., Ranbaxy Laboratories, LTD and others
In Re:
Solodyn (Minocycline Hydrochloride) Antitrust Litigation
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Consolidated Plaintiffs
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Elmachtoub v. Ariad Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv13109
Plaintiff:
Nabil Elmachtoub
Defendant:
Ariad Pharmaceuticals, Inc. , Harvey J. Berger , Frank G. Haluska and others
Movant:
William A. Gaul, D.M.D. , Joseph Bradley , City of Fort Lauderdale Police & Fire Retirement System and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Greater Pennsylvania Carpenters' Pension Fund v. Ariad Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv13082
Plaintiff:
Greater Pennsylvania Carpenters' Pension Fund
Defendant:
Ariad Pharmaceuticals, Inc. , Harvey J. Berger , Timothy P. Clackson and others
Movant:
William A. Gaul, D.M.D. , Joseph Bradley , City of Fort Lauderdale Police & Fire Retirement System and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
