Cases 61 - 70 of 356
Robert D. v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv00323
Plaintiff:
Robert A Deacon, III
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Burgess v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv11805
Plaintiff:
Charles F.O. Burgess
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Ramos v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv11815
Plaintiff:
Julianna Ramos
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Michael M. v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv00320
Plaintiff:
Michael A McKiernan
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Jose M. v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv00319
Plaintiff:
Jose Morel
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Sarlo v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv11645
Plaintiff:
Dawn Sarlo
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Westgate v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv11611
Plaintiff:
Amy M Westgate
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Perez v. Kijakazi
as 3:2023cv30075
Plaintiff:
Eudith Perez
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Jabin v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv11558
Plaintiff:
Sufra Amreen Jabin
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner Kilolo Kijakazi and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Newman Larkin v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv11542
Plaintiff:
Crystal Newman Larkin
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
Social Security Adminstration - Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
