Cases 61 - 70 of 1,235
Khoyi v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv10317
Plaintiff:
Lauren Amy Khoyi and Lauren Amy Khoyi Noyes
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Grassis v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv10543
Plaintiff:
Joseph Michael Grassis
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv10529
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Hadley v. Capone et al
as 1:2024cv10520
Plaintiff:
Laura A. Hadley, Devol Pond Association, The 2021 Hadley Family Real Estate Trust and others
Defendant:
Chris Capone, Paul Joncas, Pamela Wilkinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Marilyn M v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00086
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Marrero
Defendant:
Martin OMalley
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Mercado v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv10423
Plaintiff:
Leslie Mercado
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Smith v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv10417
Plaintiff:
Jamile C Smith
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Howell v. O'Malley
as 24-1161
Plaintiff:
CURTIS L. HOWELL
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION and MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Arrington v. O'Malley, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 1:2024cv10371
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Arrington
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Kerri A v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Kerri Anderson
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
