Cases 71 - 78 of 78
LUNDY et al v. NESTLE WATERS NORTH AMERICA INC
as 2:2009cv00318
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM F LUNDY , DAVID FRASER , NEIL F SORENSEN and others
Defendant:
NESTLE WATERS NORTH AMERICA INC
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. WALKER YOUNG et al
as 2:2009mc00155
Plaintiff:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant:
DONALD ANTHONY WALKER YOUNG, ACORN CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC, ACORN II LP and others
Receiver:
LOUIS C BECHTLE
BOUCHARD v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
as 1:2009cv00150
Plaintiff:
DARREN ANTHONY BOUCHARD
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
MACHIAVELLI v. BARBER FOODS INC et al
as 2:2009cv00049
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MACHIAVELLI
Defendant:
BARBER FOODS INC and DOES 1-20
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
SHANNON v. SASSEVILLE
as 2:2008cv00343
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SHANNON
Defendant:
SARTO ANTHONY SASSEVILLE
Counter_claimant:
SARTO ANTHONY SASSEVILLE
Counter_defendant:
MICHAEL SHANNON
Movant:
ROBERT C VILAS , MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER AND SMITH , MARK PELLERIN and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
KEENAN et al v. INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MACHINISTS AND AEROSPACE WORKERS (GRAND LODGE) et al
as 2:2008cv00147
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL A KEENAN , TROY E OSGOOD , MICHAEL G CYR and others
Defendant:
INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MACHINISTS AND AEROSPACE WORKERS (GRAND LODGE) , R THOMAS BUFFENBARGER , LYNN D TUCKER and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
DAY v. USA
as 2:2007cv00097
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY DAY
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
FORD v. WARDEN, MAINE STATE PRISON et al
as 2:2007cv00068
Plaintiff:
SCOTT ANTHONY FORD
Defendant:
WARDEN, MAINE STATE PRISON, COMMISSIONER, MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and JOHN LORENZEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
